Bribery in international business

Argentina - OECD Anti-Bribery Convention


Monitoring and evaluation

‌‌Argentina's Phase 1bis Monitoring Report

29/06/19 - This report details Argentina's achievements and challenges in respect to implementation and enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, as well as progress made since the Phase 3 evaluation in 2012.  

Download the full report 


Argentina's accession

8 February 2001 
Deposit of instrument of ratification

9 April 2001 
Entry into force of the Convention

10 November 1999
Entry into force of implementing legislation

Monitoring and peer review history

2023 Phase 3bis additional follow-up report and report on pending legislation

2019 Follow-up to Phase 3bis report

2019 Phase 1bis report

2017 Phase 3bis report

2014 Phase 3 Report

News releases

2017 Argentina must urgently enact Corporate Liability Bill to rectify serious non-compliance with Anti-Bribery ConventionSpanish

2016 Argentina must seize chance to fight corruption | Spanish 

2014 Argentina seriously non-compliant with key articles of Anti-Bribery Convention, says OECD [Spanish]

2008 OECD urges Argentina to improve capacity to enforce the Anti-Bribery Convention

2007 OECD Working Group on Bribery concerned by Argentina's postponement of on-site visit



The OECD Anti-Bribery Convention

The OECD Anti-Bribery Convention establishes standards to criminalise bribery of foreign public officials in international business transactions.

Full text and related documents

All country reports


OECD Working Group on Bribery 

The OECD Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions is responsible for monitoring the implementation and enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, the 2021 Recommendation and related instruments. The Working Group is made up of representatives from the States Parties to the Convention and meets regularly.

Learn more about the Working Group


Monitoring and evaluation

Monitoring of implementation and enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention takes places in successive phases through a rigorous peer-review monitoring system. 

Description of each phase of evaluation




Related Documents