Share

Competition

Methodologies to measure market competition

 

 11 June 2021  Zoom

A perceived reduction of the intensity of competition has been used by some to criticise competition authorities and to propose radical changes to competition law systems. The ability to reliably measure, track and compare the competitive intensity of a market is extremely valuable to competition authorities and other policymakers to inform decision-making. The fact that competition is a complex notion, and therefore not directly observable, has resulted in the development of numerous methods to capture and measure the degree of competition in markets over the years. Such methods, which vary in complexity and reliability, provide indicators often used to measure the intensity of competition. These indicators can provide useful information but present limitations and careful interpretation is generally necessary, in particular when they are taken in isolation.

A workshop on this topic took place on 23 February 2021 focusing on concrete experiences by competition authorities. The discussion in June 2021 complemented this workshop by discussing the principles and the suitability of these methodologies. In particular, this session explored common competition indicators and other tools to measure the intensity of competition in a market. It assessed their advantages and limitation (both conceptual and practical). It then explored the different issues for competition authorities to consider when selecting/using empirical measures to infer the intensity of competition in a market or sector such as what are the problems with relying on just one type of empirical measure? How does the purpose for which the empirical measures are to be used influence which ones are likely to be relevant? How do the relevant group of empirical measures differ according to the specificities of the sector or market?

All related documentation is available on this page.

» Read the OECD Issues Paper

» Detailed summary of the discussion EN / FR

» Executive summary with key findings EN / FR

» See full list of best practice roundtables on competition 

 

 

measuring scale 

Invited speakers

Tomaso Duso Bio 

Head of Department in the Firms and Markets Department, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin)

Camila Cabral Pires-Alves Bio  

Professor at Institute of Economics at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) and coordinator at the Research Group on Law, Economics, and Competition (Gdec/UFRJ)

Mike Walker Bio

Chief Economic Adviser, UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA)

John Small Bio 

Commissioner at the New Zealand Commerce Commission

Videos

Mike Walker and the UK experience in measuring competition and the way forward

Full Youtube playlist with other videos on the topic

Documents

OECD Issues Paper (French version also available)‌‌

Contributions from delegations

Greece

Korea

Mexico

New Zealand

Turkey

United States

Brazil

Chinese Taipei

Ukraine

Summaries of contributions 

Presentations

 

 

OECD Competition Division 

 
Related best practice roundtables

Market Power in the Digital Economy and Competition Policy (2022)

Market concentration (2018)

Market study methodologies for competition authorities (2017)

Geographic market definition across national borders (2016)

The role of market studies as a tool to promote competition (2016)

Market Definition (2012)

Market Studies (2008)

See also

OECD work on Market Studies and Competition

Workshop on methodologies to measure market competition (2021)

Market Studies Guide for Competition Authorities (2018)

OECD best practice roundtables on competition

More OECD work on competition

 

Related Documents