Read the background note |
2022 OECD GLOBAL FORUM ON COMPETITION DISCUSSES REMEDIES AND COMMITMENTS IN ABUSE CASES When an abusive conduct of dominant undertakings is found, this will often require competition authorities, in addition to sanctions and/or cease and desist orders, or as an alternative way of case resolution, to impose remedies or accept commitments by the dominant undertakings. The aim is to effectively stop the abusive conduct, and to create conditions that allow to restore or enable competition. To avoid further damage to the markets in question, such remedies and commitments need to be timely, effective, and proportionate. In December 2022, the Global Forum on Competition held a roundtable to revisit the options available to competition authorities in designing such remedies and commitments, and discussed practical insights and experiences, in particular:
This page contains all related documentation. Back to the Global Forum home page More OECD Best Practice Roundtables on Competition Policy
FORUM 2022 The Goals of Competition Policy (Ouvert au public) Subsidies, Competition and Trade Interactions between competition authorities and sector regulators |
Speakers
|
Documents
Contributions from delegations
|
Interim Interim Measures in Antitrust Investigations, OECD Policy Roundtables 2022 Sanctions in Antitrust Cases OECD Global Forum on Competition 2016 Commitment Decisions in Antitrust Cases, OECD Policy Roundtables 2016 Remedies in Merger Cases, OECD Policy Roundtables 2011 Remedies and Sanctions in Abuse of Dominance Cases, OECD Policy Roundtables 2006 |
Related Documents